close_game
close_game

Tihar jail opposes Kejriwal’s request for add’l meetings with lawyers

Jul 16, 2024 05:20 AM IST

Rule 585 of Delhi Prison Rules, 2018, allows every inmate to have two physical “mulakat (meeting)” or “e-mulakat” with their family members in a week and two physical meetings or e-legal meetings with their advocates in a week

New Delhi

Arvind Kejriwal in CBI custody. (PTI)
Arvind Kejriwal in CBI custody. (PTI)

The Tihar jail superintendent opposed chief minister Arvind Kejriwal’s plea in the Delhi high court seeking additional meetings with his lawyers to discuss and plan strategies with regard to multiple litigations pending against him, saying that the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) supremo cannot be granted “special treatment”.

“That Tihar Prison is currently housing approximately 20,000 inmates (including undertrials and convicts) out of which many of the inmates are facing trials in many cases even more than the petitioner herein, but the Rule 585 of Delhi Prison Rules,2018 is equal for all and the petitioner cannot be granted special treatment. Further providing special treatment to any inmate shall set a wrong precedent and in violation of Delhi Prison Rules, 2018,” the reply filed by the superintendent, Central Jail No 2, Tihar, said.

Rule 585 of Delhi Prison Rules, 2018, allows every inmate to have two physical “mulakat (meeting)” or “e-mulakat” with their family members in a week and two physical meetings or e-legal meetings with their advocates in a week.

Although the matter was listed before a bench of justice Neena Bansal Krishna for Monday, the same could not be taken up due to lack of time and was adjourned to July 18.

Kejriwal had approached the high court against a city court’s order on July 1, rejecting his plea seeking two additional meetings with his lawyers through videoconferencing.

In the order, the court said Kejriwal’s legal team failed to provide convincing reasons for the CM to be granted additional meetings, given that a previous plea was also dismissed. To be sure, the city court, on April 10, dismissed Kejriwal’s plea seeking five additional meetings with his lawyers.

In his plea before the high court, the CM said that multiple cases were pending against him in different states and additional meetings were required to discuss the way forward in various litigations pending against him. The petition underscored that proper legal representation qua 35-40 cases pending against him is his fundamental right.

The CM further sought relief on the grounds of parity, claiming that the court had allowed co-accused and Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh’s plea for additional meetings. Opposing the claim, the superintendent, in an eight-page reply, said that the order allowing additional meetings to Singh was passed without hearing the opposite side and jail authorities, and considering the relevant jail rules.

Kejriwal has been in custody since March 21 following his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate, apart from a 21-day interim bail in May granted by the top court for Lok Sabha election campaigning. On Friday, the Supreme Court granted interim bail to Kejriwal in the ED case, acknowledging that he has spent over 90 days in incarceration. Still, he would continue to remain in custody due to his arrest in a separate case being investigated by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) related to the same matter.

The case against the CM stems from allegations of irregularities in Delhi’s now-scrapped excise policy of 2021-22, which the CBI began probing following a recommendation by Delhi’s lieutenant governor in July 2022.

Kejriwal was the third AAP leader arrested in this connection. Former deputy CM Manish Sisodia has been in jail since February 2023, and Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh was granted bail by the top court in April, after six months of custody.

On June 26, he was arrested by the CBI in the Rouse Avenue Court after a sequence of dramatic developments in court. In the remand note, the agency alleged that Kejriwal is “one of the main conspirators of the criminal conspiracy” and said that Vijay Nair, a former party functionary, was contacting various liquor manufacturers and traders and demanding undue gratification since March 2021.

rec-icon Recommended Topics
Share this article
Catch every big hit, every wicket with Crickit, a one stop destination for Live Scores, Match Stats, Infographics & much more. Explore now!

Stay updated with all top Cities including, Bengaluru, Delhi, Mumbai and more across India. Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News
See More
Catch every big hit, every wicket with Crickit, a one stop destination for Live Scores, Match Stats, Infographics & much more. Explore now!

Stay updated with all top Cities including, Bengaluru, Delhi, Mumbai and more across India. Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
SHARE
Story Saved
Live Score
Saved Articles
Following
My Reads
Sign out
New Delhi 0C
Friday, February 07, 2025
Start 14 Days Free Trial Subscribe Now
Follow Us On