Of Bilkis Bano, remission, and the Supreme Court - Hindustan Times
close_game
close_game

Of Bilkis Bano, remission, and the Supreme Court

Sep 03, 2022 07:11 PM IST

The Bilkis Bano case has become a litmus test at many levels. That’s the case for Indian women and for the SC. But isn’t that also true for our country? I would say it is. Because, on the outcome depends the sanctity of justice

Perhaps because so many believe that in due course, the Supreme Court (SC) will rescind the remission granted to 11 men guilty of raping Bilkis Bano and murdering seven members of her family, I have decided to raise a few questions and create a little doubt. It’s not that I don’t have faith in the court, but more because it’s worth seeing the other side of the picture. Otherwise, we could end up deluding ourselves.

To start with, let’s not forget it’s the same Supreme Court that set in motion the process of remission with, arguably, some very questionable decisions to whom we are appealing. (AP File Photo) PREMIUM
To start with, let’s not forget it’s the same Supreme Court that set in motion the process of remission with, arguably, some very questionable decisions to whom we are appealing. (AP File Photo)

To start with, let’s not forget it’s the same SC that set in motion the process of remission with, arguably, some very questionable decisions to whom we are appealing. Two of those decisions are that the case for remission should be heard under the 1992 policy and this should be done by the government of Gujarat. The latter is the more disturbing. Not only does it appear to breach Section 432(7)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), which explicitly states the appropriate government is that of the state where the offender was sentenced, but there’s an even bigger concern. In 2004, Bilkis Bano’s case was transferred by the SC to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and moved from Gujarat to Maharashtra because of apprehensions of bias in Gujarat. Isn’t it odd that when it came to remission, those apprehensions were not considered?

However, I have two further concerns. The first arises from the way Gujarat handled the remission. The opinion of the judge who conducted the trial wasn’t sought. It seems unlikely that the opinion of the central government was invited even though it’s explicitly required under Section 435 of the CrPC for matters investigated by the CBI. I’m pretty sure of this because if the central government had been consulted, its recently issued guidelines would have required a refusal of remission. And, then, five members of the committee that recommended remission are Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) functionaries and two are sitting BJP Members of Legislative Assembly.

Given all this, shouldn’t the SC have taken suo motu cognisance of the matter? It has the power to do so. But in this case, there’s perhaps also a moral obligation. After all, it set in motion the process of remission. If that ended up with the “wrong” outcome, shouldn’t the court have stepped in to rectify matters?

The second concern is a possible hint of the court’s attitude. On August 25, justice Ajay Rastogi, who’s hearing this matter, asked: “Merely because the act was horrific is that sufficient to say remission is wrong?… Day in and day out remission is granted to convicts of life sentences, what is the exception?” Now, these are just questions. It’s very possible they’re rhetorical. But can you be certain they don’t convey a lot more?

These doubts suggest the outcome may neither be as clear nor as welcome as we would like. I don’t intend to second guess what the court will do, but only ask, can we really be confident it will send the 11 convicts back to jail? What if it doesn’t? After all, the process that led to their remission was in accord with what the SC required. In which case, if the 11 remain free, how should we interpret that denouement?

The Bilkis Bano case has become a litmus test at many levels. That’s clearly the case for Indian women and, perhaps, more forcefully, for the SC. But isn’t that also true for our country? I would say it is. Because, on the outcome depends the sanctity of justice in India.

Judging by the international media, you could go one step further. A report on the BBC asks if the felicitation of the convicts suggests rape is being normalised in India. You may not accept that as a legitimate question, but the fact that it’s been raised means the world’s eyes are on us.

An awful lot depends on how the SC handles this matter and what conclusion it comes to. That’s something I’m confident the judges are aware of. Which is why their decision will be so critical.

Karan Thapar is the author of Devil’s Advocate: The Untold Story

The views expressed are personal

Unveiling 'Elections 2024: The Big Picture', a fresh segment in HT's talk show 'The Interview with Kumkum Chadha', where leaders across the political spectrum discuss the upcoming general elections. Watch Now!

Continue reading with HT Premium Subscription

Daily E Paper I Premium Articles I Brunch E Magazine I Daily Infographics
freemium
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Share this article
  • ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    author-default-90x90

    Karan Thapar is a super-looking genius who’s young, friendly, chatty and great fun to be with. He’s also very enjoyable to read.

SHARE
Story Saved
Live Score
OPEN APP
Saved Articles
Following
My Reads
Sign out
New Delhi 0C
Thursday, March 28, 2024
Start 14 Days Free Trial Subscribe Now
Follow Us On